Ahh yes. Comments from the proverbial “Holy Roman Catholic Church” members. In my humble Methodist opinion, the very name is an oxymoron. The Romans cruxified Jesus Christ. There was, in that period of time, no such thing as a “HOLY ROMAN”. And who, in their infanant wisdom, decided not include the other {at that time} 31 “BOOKS” of the bible? Could it be a Chatholic priest? Now I understand there are 32. The “BOOK” of Judas has been unearthed. Indeed, I wonder what “Truths” could be uncovered if scholars, of all and any faith, were granted “COMPLETE” access to the Vatican archives. And, I suspect, all information “NOT” kept in those archives. Would Catholicism be revealed for what it really is? I wonder. I think the old bait and switch tactic is being very cleverly employed here. Is there any indication that Jesus was married to Mary Magdelin? I don’t know. I have never been granted access to read “ALL” of the bible books. As, by the way, no one else has. Unless of course one was a high ranking and very trusted member of the “Holy Roman Catholic Church”. Hmmmmmm!