There were two wars going on in Iraq - one was fought with armies of soldiers, bombs and a fearsome military force. The other was fought alongside it with cameras, satellites, armies of journalists and propaganda techniques. One war was rationalized as an effort to find and disarm WMDs - Weapons of Mass Destruction; the other was carried out by even more powerful WMDs, Weapons of Mass Deception.The TV networks in America considered their non-stop coverage their finest hour, pointing to the use of embedded journalists and new technologies that permitted viewers to see a war up close for the first time. But different countries saw different wars. Why?For those of us watching the coverage, war was more of a spectacle, an around the clock global media marathon, pitting media outlets against each other in ways that distorted truth and raised as many questions about the methods of TV news, as it did the armed intervention it was covering-and it some cases-promoting.WMD busts through so-called "objective reporting" to challenge media complicity with the government and its cooperation in presenting the Iraq War the way it did. This is a hard-hitting, yet personal film that looks at the television war and asks why the American audience lapped it up and how the Pentagon helped shape media coverage.
Democracy doesn’t function unless citizens participate in the political process. Without it, the system can be undermined by money, power and corruption. Learn More »
less than a minute ago
Exploring the enigmatic life and music of Harry Nilsson in an attempt to answer the question, "Who is Harry Nilsson?"
less than a minute ago
Travel back in time and explore the ancient myths and legends of this fabled city
1 minute ago
Update of popular Fox TV Special never available on DVD with new exclusive ghostly apparitions and analysis.
DISCUSS WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION